
With the transportation by vehicle of entire film crews, and the disposable props and bottled water of film shoots (not to mention entire large-scale sets being built and thrown away- think of the entire freeway that was built for the Matrix sequels), the sustainability of film-making appears to be a pressing issue.
As part of the BFI’s 2009 London Film Festival, a discussion on the sustainability of the filmmaking was held in association with Time Out magazine, featuring environmental writers and film industry insiders.
Andy Whitaker, of the distribution company Dogwoof, discussed how the premiere for his release of Franny Armstrong’s film The Age of Stupid was a ‘0-footprint’ affair, where big names like Vivienne Westwood turned up on a bicycle rather than in a limo. Next, the Guardian journalist Leo Hickman reflected on the Mayor of London’s recent ‘Green Screen’ report, which examined the capital’s film and television industry. Apparently, 125,000 tonnes of CO2 is emitted by this sector per year (that's the equivalent of 24,000 households). According to report, the breakdown of the London screen industry’s emissions consists of 40% from studio production, and 17% from location shooting. The report also indicated that London is the third busiest centre for movie production.
Leo picked up on a fascinating project planned for Pinewood Studios, outer West-London, where a ‘living and working community for creatives’ will be created, consisting of 1,400 sustainable new dwellings situated in the re-created streets of New York, San Fransisco, Amsterdam and Paris. This somewhat bizarre place will enable people to live in an atmospheric re-creation of a foreign city, where crews can come and shoot scenes without having to constantly re-build sets or transport a film crew to the foreign city in question. Pinewood hope that the project will bring about a maximum 77% reduction in emissions for the average film or commercial (quite optimistic). A local resident of Pinewood pointed out that, at £300- £400,000 per property, these homes will be far from affordable.
This ‘re-usable set’ concept brought up the ‘Film City’ of Bombay, where a variety of indoor sets exist and are re-used, with slight modifications, by many film crews working on different films. It also brought up slightly humorous memories of the Hammer films and the gothic castle on the Thames which served in many of their 1970s productions.
An interesting company mentioned in the discussion was Green Shoot whose business it is supply green runners to film sets, who are responbible for on-set recycling. They also provide a film set recycling service (currently sets all go to landfill), and carry out green audits for productions. Green Shoot’s founders come from a standard film background, and its creation had more of a financial motivation that a green one, going to show that recycling the elements of film production can be a profitable venture. They’ve greened up productions such as the St Trinians movies, amongst others.
Another issue mentioned was the distribution of films throughout the UK cinema network. At four to eight weeks of release per film, and with over half of UK cinemas still using 35mm film, a lot of large and heavy cans of film (up to seven cans per normal-length film) have to be transported around the country, and indeed the world. The 35mm film is generally thrown away by the cinema at the end of the run.
Nicola Giuggioli of Brightwide.com discussed his own internet platform which streams high-quality eco, green and social film. A great example of a high-quality green film streaming online is ‘Home’, an aerial film of Earth available on YouTube in High Definition.
Despite the emotionally persuasive breed of environmental films ‘emitted’ by Hollywood (excuse the pun), whether they be disaster movies such as The Day After Tomorrow or child-based animation like Wall-E, many factions within Hollywood still stay away from environmetal film-making; one reason for this is that whilst the clients of advertising companies often want to look green for marketing benefits, and will therefore be open to ways to green up their advertisement shoots, larger feature-film companies exist on their own plain and have less to answer to.
However, the talk did highlight the perhaps little-known fact amongst the cinema-going public that Warner Brothers are actually leading the way in recognised, commended green initiatives. What with the wholesale Fairtrade conversion of Starbucks, the weather seems to be finally turning- another omen exists with the rumours of looming legislation, including a ‘landfill tax’ that will make it a financially necessity to green-up film. This pressure is perhaps what is stimulating some of this change.
Although, as one person at the talk aptly put it, if there’s a skip on every film set, why not put a ‘green skip’ there instead?
Posted under Articles, Events, Lifestyle & Fashion
This post was written by Barnaby Tidman on October 22, 2009
-->














